- fix bug when not use Unmarshal2Map correctly

This commit is contained in:
gazebo
2019-01-31 11:58:15 +08:00
parent b6f7921b76
commit 7a5326a1dc
4 changed files with 18 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ func NormalMakeMapByStructObject(mapData map[string]interface{}, obj interface{}
return retVal
}
// 此函数要求mapData中的数据类型是完全正确的可利用函数utils.Unmarshal2Map比如整数浮点不能为通用的Number型
func StrictMakeMapByStructObject(mapData map[string]interface{}, obj interface{}, userName string) (retVal map[string]interface{}) {
retVal, _ = IDCULDFilterMapByStructObject(mapData, obj, true)
return retVal

View File

@@ -464,8 +464,9 @@ func (p *PurchaseHandler) syncSkuNameAsSpu(db *dao.DaoDB, sku *model.Sku, skuExt
if sku.JdSyncStatus&model.SyncFlagSpecMask != 0 {
skuIndex := sku.SkuIndex
if skuIndex > 0 {
// saleAttrValue := composeSkuSpec(sku.SpecQuality, sku.SpecUnit, skuExt.Unit)
// err = api.JdAPI.UpdateSpuSaleAttr(utils.Int2Str(skuExt.ID), utils.Int2Str(jdapi.SaleAttrIDBase), "", utils.Int2Str(jdapi.SaleAttrValueIDBase+skuIndex-1), saleAttrValue)
saleAttrValue := composeSkuSpec(sku.SpecQuality, sku.SpecUnit, skuExt.Unit)
globals.SugarLogger.Debugf("syncSkuNameAsSpu outSuperId:%d, saleAttrId:%d, saleAttrValueId:%d, saleAttrValueName:%s", skuExt.ID, jdapi.SaleAttrIDBase, jdapi.SaleAttrValueIDBase+skuIndex-1, saleAttrValue)
err = api.JdAPI.UpdateSpuSaleAttr(utils.Int2Str(skuExt.ID), utils.Int2Str(jdapi.SaleAttrIDBase), "", utils.Int2Str(jdapi.SaleAttrValueIDBase+skuIndex-1), saleAttrValue)
}
}
}